A wave of protest swept through Milwaukee as demonstrators gathered outside an FBI facility in response to the arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan. The judge is accused of helping an undocumented immigrant avoid detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a move that has sparked fierce debate on both sides of the political spectrum.
According to reports, Dugan allegedly allowed the individual to leave her courtroom and later gave misleading information to ICE agents. The FBI arrested her on charges related to obstruction of justice. Her arrest has ignited strong reactions from both critics and supporters.
Protesters rallied with signs and chants like “No shame, no fear, immigrants are welcome here,” calling for support of immigrant rights and fair judicial treatment. However, some conservative commentators and Trump administration allies viewed the protest as misguided, accusing the demonstrators of defending unlawful behavior.
Attorney General Pam Bondi spoke out against the judge’s actions, saying, “The rule of law is clear. No one is above it—whether you’re a private citizen or a judge.” Others, like Emilio De Torre, executive director of Milwaukee Turners, argued that Dugan was simply protecting due process and helping ensure that court proceedings are fair for everyone, regardless of immigration status.
“This kind of arrest sends a chilling message to communities,” De Torre said. “People may become afraid to attend court for even simple matters like paying a fine.”
Footage of the protest was shared online by Right Angle News, showing crowds gathered and voicing their support for Dugan. The video was quickly met with a mix of reactions. Some questioned the decision to protest outside the FBI building, suggesting efforts might be better directed at the federal prosecutor’s office, which decides whether or not to file charges.
Critics on social media debated the fairness of the situation, with some accusing demonstrators of applying double standards when it comes to legal accountability. Others highlighted concerns about maintaining trust in the legal system while respecting the independence of the judiciary.
As the case unfolds, discussions about immigration enforcement, the role of judges, and the balance between legal responsibility and personal values are likely to continue. Judge Dugan’s future may involve formal proceedings that could include censure or even impeachment, depending on how the case is resolved.